JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 30, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Hector Hernan Mondragon Baez

✓
Topic · hard data
Corrección En La Parte Motiva De La Sentencia C-320 De 2006. Se Corrigen Unos Errores Mecanograficos Involuntarios Cometidos En La Parte Motiva De La Sentencia C-320/06al Citar Unas Providencias
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia sólo respecto de frases o conceptos de la parte resolutiva o cuando lo expuesto en la parte motiva influya en ella
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Corregir la parte motiva de la sentencia C-320 de 2006, expediente D- 5983, p. 38, último párrafo, cuyo texto es el siguiente
  2. "Posteriormente, en sentencia C-776 de 2001, la Corte Constitucional se refirió a los límites a los deberes en un Estado Social y Democrático de Derecho."
  3. Segundo. Corregir la parte motiva de la sentencia C-320 de 2006, expediente D- 5983, p. 39, último párrafo, cuyo texto es el siguiente
  4. "Más recientemente, esta Corporación en sentencia C-246 de 2002 consideró que en estricto sentido, la única obligación constitucional es la que prescribe el cumplimiento de la carta y de las leyes (artículo 95 C.N.).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.